SMS scnews item created by James East at Fri 6 Feb 2009 0934
Type: Seminar
Distribution: World
Expiry: 9 Feb 2009
Calendar1: 9 Feb 2009 1205-1255
CalLoc1: Carslaw 375
Auth: jamese@pisa.maths.usyd.edu.au

Algebra Seminar

Tame and wild automorphisms of free algebras

Shestakov

Let A_n be an algebra of polynomials or a free associative algebra over a field F of characteristic 0 on generators x_1,...,x_n and Aut(A_n) be its group of automorphisms. An automorphism \phi\in Aut(A_n) is called elementary if it is of the form

\phi : (x_1,...,x_i,...,x_n) \mapsto (x_1,...,\lambda.x_i + f,...,x_n),

where 0\not=\lambda\in F and the element f belongs to the subalgebra generated by x_1,...,x_{i-1}, x_{i+1},...,x_n. The subgroup generated by all elementary automorphisms is denoted by Tame(A_n); its elements are called tame automorphisms.

In 1942 Jung proved that, for the case of polynomials, Aut(A_2) = Tame(A_2). In the beginning of the 70s, Makar-Limanov and Czerniakiewicz proved the same result for free associative algebras. In both cases, it remained an open question whether the same is true for n \geq 3.

In 1972 Nagata constructed an automorphism of the algebra of polinomials A_3 which he suggested to be non-tame (wild). Later Anick provided a candidate for a wild automorphism in the free associative algebra on 3 generators.

In 2004, Shestakov and Umirbaev solved the problem of wild automorphisms in the algebra of polynomials A_3 by proving that the Nagata automorphism is wild. Recently, Umirbaev has proved that the Anick automorphism is wild as well.

In our talk, we will give some ideas and methods of the proofs of these results and will formulate some new results and conjectures. In particular, we present a wild automorphism in the free Jordan algebra on three generators.


If you are registered you may mark the scnews item as read.
School members may try to .